Skip to content

Google Project Shows Value of Open Judicial Records

2009 November 20
by recapthelaw

We’re excited to see Google has unveiled a dramatic expansion of Google Scholar to include Supreme Court decisions going back to the 18th century, lower federal court decisions since the 1920s, and state Supreme Court and appellate decisions going back to the 1950s. They’ve done an impressive job with automated parsing of legal citations, transforming them into hyperlinks and allowing Google to do automated analysis of case similarity.

This type of project was precisely what we had in mind when some of us wrote “Government Data and the Invisible Hand” last year. The judiciary may be the foundation of a free society, but it’s not especially good at building websites or search engines. By making public records easily available for re-publications by third parties, the judiciary (and the other branches of government) can enable private parties to dramatically expand public access to public information.

In this case, the state and federal courts haven’t made it easy to download bulk data, so Google had to get the information from third parties. Google is a big company with significant resources at its disposal. But in an ideal world, it wouldn’t take the resources of a large company to get access to this kind of data. Of course, this is precisely the vision behind RECAP. We hope to build a free, public, and comprehensive repository of federal judicial records so that large companies like Google, small start-ups, and even non-profit organizations can get access to the data and build tools to do make these records more accessible and useful.

RECAP’s database is more limited than Google’s in some ways; we only store federal district court cases going back about 10 years. But it’s much more extensive in other respects; we have much more than just the final opinion in a case. We’d love to have third parties such as Google incorporate the data in RECAP into a tool like Google Scholar. But we’d be even happier if the judiciary itself took the lead, by freeing access to PACER and enabling bulk downloads. Google’s impressive new legal search tools show just how much value private parties can add when they build on public data.

4 Responses leave one →
  1. Matt permalink
    November 20, 2009

    Being able to work with a data set like this would be very exciting. Has a date been set for making the RECAP database available for download to independent developers?

  2. admin permalink
    November 21, 2009

    Hi Matt,

    We want to make sure we have some privacy and scalability issues nailed down before we open up the database to the general public. But please get in touch with us if you’re with an organization interested in re-publishing the data.

    -Tim

  3. Jesse permalink
    September 1, 2010

    Has there been any successful dialog with Google Scholar about incorporating your database?

  4. September 2, 2010

    The dialog was very successful in the sense that they expressed strong interest. We were mostly waiting until we had a better landing page for cases to provide them with, which we now have on the RECAP Archive site. We still have some user interface improvements we’d like to make, but your comment is a good reminder that we should re-engage with them.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS